@Article{EpiphanioHuet:1994:SoLiRe,
author = "Epiphanio, Jos{\'e} Carlos Neves and Huete, A. R",
title = "Soil and litter reflectance contrast effects on vegetation indices
and their relationship to FAPAR",
journal = "EOS Transactions",
year = "1994",
volume = "75",
number = "44",
pages = "206",
keywords = "Vegetation indices (VIs).",
abstract = "Vegetation indices (VIs)derived from remote sensing data are
related to important vegetation parameters, e.g. fAPAR and LAI.
These parameters are regular inputs to models of primary
productivity. Generally, VIs use relationships between near
infrared (NIR)and red reflectances and may utilize the blue band
for atmospheric correction. Soil brightness influences on canopy
reflectance and VIs have been well shown. Soil color effects as
well as canopy backgrounds with litter present, however, have been
less well studied. These backgrounds not only affect brightness,
but also significantly alter the contrast ratio of NIR and red
reflectances. The effects of background NIR/red reflectance
contrast due to presence of litter and soil on different VI's were
studied using the Myneni canopy radiative transfer model. Several
ground cover percentages and two clump LAI's were simulated. The
background NIR/red reflectance ratio was varied from 0.9 to 1.5,
and the red reflectance was allowed to vary from 0.1 to 0.35, thus
covering a large range of background reflectances. It is shown
that the NIR/red contrast of backgrounds affect the VIs, and that
VIs which reduce background brightness effects also reduce
background NIR/red contrast effects, mainly for low vegetation
amounts. fAPAR was computed and the effects of background NIR/red
reflectance ratio on the relationships between VIs and fAPAR are
discussed.",
issn = "2324-9250",
label = "7044",
language = "en",
targetfile = "INPE 6566.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "26 abr. 2024"
}